Premise
A difficult optimization paper can become a three-to-five-minute visual lesson when the workflow separates source checking, storyboarding, and rendering.
Setup
- Provide the paper and any supplementary figures.
- Define the audience’s assumed background and target duration.
- Connect an animation or video-generation tool.
- Approve the storyboard before rendering.
Boundaries
- Unsupported claims and decorative citations are forbidden.
- Publishing and uploading remain manual.
First extract the central claim, required concepts, evidence, and practical implication. Then submit a ten-line storyboard containing a one-sentence hook, three to five visual scenes, on-screen definitions for unavoidable jargon, and a final “what changes in practice” scene.
Attach each factual or mathematical claim to a source location. If a concept cannot be represented accurately in a clean visual, flag or remove that scene instead of hand-waving.
Wait for storyboard approval before rendering. Do not add claims, citations, or comparisons absent from the source. Save the finished file locally; never upload or publish it.
Prompt
Convert the source I provide into a clear animated explainer for the named audience, targeting three to five minutes.